I feel as if I have been preparing for
this assignment for a long time. This topic is dear to my heart and to my
personal experiences. I would love to contribute to what little literature there
is about the lives of Deaf people.
I would like to learn more about the Deaf
adults’ early childhood education experiences. Did they have positive or
negative experiences and why? Three subtopics are as follows:
1. What experiences caused them to have
positive or negative early childhood education experiences?
2. Did they receive visual language
(American Sign Language) intervention services during early childhood
education?
3. What were their experiences when
learning American Sign Language?
Because of my personal experiences, I am
inclined toward choosing subtopic #1 because it would allow me to keep my
personal biases to a minimum. The participants’ responses will constitute the
data that I am looking for. I have heard some parents and hearing professionals
discuss that today the early childhood experiences of deaf students are
different and more positive today. Maybe that’s true, but the stories from deaf
adults tell me otherwise. Today, I still hear stories of how the turning point
in their lives is when they learn American Sign Language. They would say that
they did not realize how much they were missing, or how much easier life became
since learning ASL. All of this is counterintuitive to everyone else except to
deaf people themselves. People have said that the reading and math scores of
deaf students have gotten from bad to worse.
My three professional and personal
reasons for choosing these three subtopics can be applied to my revised early
childhood education research topic.
1. Deaf children’s IFSPs and IEPs usually
have a audiological and medical focus instead of a focus on their need for access
to language or access to general education. The goal of the government-funded
National Center for Hearing Assessment and Management (NCHAM) is “to ensure
that all infants and toddlers with hearing loss are identified as early as
possible and provided with timely and appropriate audiological, educational,
and medical intervention” (NCHAM, n.d,).
2. Consequently, there is an iatrogenic
effect. An iatrogenic effect is an attempted medical cure that becomes a
complication (Gerson, 2015). I keep hearing stories from educational
interpreters who said that deaf students frequently come to kindergarten not
knowing their names or colors. I also hear from professionals that this is “normal”
for deaf students.
3. The complication from the medical
focus of deaf children’s early childhood education is that, frequently, they
become language delayed or even language deprived.
The
three ways that I hope my researching these topics will have an impact are the
following:
1. A public policy recommendation that
intervention services for Deaf children and their families to include American
Sign Language so that Deaf and hard of hearing (DHH) children will get 100%
access to a language and that the families can communicate with their DHH
children.
2. Their early childhood education will
have a focus on both language development and educational.
3. DHH children will become more Kindergarten-ready.
References
Gerson, M. (May 4, 2015). The intricate
knot of urban poverty. San Diego Union
Tribune. Retrieved from: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2015/may/04/gerson-the-intricate-knot-of-urban-poverty/
NCHAM. (n.d.) Retrieved May 2015 from: http://www.infanthearing.org/
Wow, I have learned so much from your blog and discussion posts in just two weeks! You have thought out your topic so well, and I can hear your passion. I am looking forward to see how you design your research. Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts with the rest of us.
ReplyDelete